>>>>> "Bruno" == Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bruno> Akim Demaille writes: >> This is a very welcome addition to Autoconf. Bruno> Nice to hear :-) Everybody I know who looked at your work was positively impressed. I still have one question though: how would you rate the impedance there is between this macro and config.rpath ot1h side and Libtool otoh? I especially interested in knowing whether what learns one of the community should be reported to the other. Bruno> So please choose some arbitrary name for the macro Bruno> (ex-AC_LIB_LINKFLAGS), and I'll use the same one in gettext. OK. I have no problem with this name. >> I just worried about seeing the Autoconf implementation being >> always hidden behind the one provided in aclocal.m4. Bruno> gettextize will be changed to not include its own version of Bruno> the macros if it finds AC_PREREQ(2.54) in the configure.in/ac. Ah! That's good to hear, thanks. ANd BTW, I now realize I forgot to report a suggestion I wanted to make for 0.11.3: given that gettextize installs these files locally, do you really want to let them be visible to aclocal? >> I also fear that we might bring in some extension to the Autoconf >> version, which will not work if the implementation is Gettext's. Bruno> That would be bad. Please tell me about the extension in such Bruno> cases, so that I can copy it into gettext/m4. Sure! But again, I was worried of the case of someone using an obsolete version of Gettext. But since Gettext's macros would not be installed if >= 2.54, my point does not hold. Thanks Bruno!
