> Wouldn't it be better to get libtool 1.5 out the door? The resources > required to achieve a releasable product are similar and CVS libtool > already contains most of the fixes that would go into a 1.4.3.
But it also contains more features. Releasing 1.5 should be done by the maintainers, not by a "community" process; instead I think that such a process is perfectly valid to review patches and ChangeLogs and put them together. Yes, libtool would-be-1.5 has been used by gcc at least since 3.0, so it should be pretty good, but I think that it is easier (in terms of brainwork, not of needed resources) to do a "definitive" 1.4.x release. Paolo
