My kneejerk suggestion is to implement m4wrap as POSIX requires, but
to add another primitive (m4parw? :-) that works the way 1.4.4 m4wrap
does.  We can then ask people who prefer things the old-fashioned way
to use m4parw.

I'd rather not have the behavior depend on POSIXLY_CORRECT.
POSIXLY_CORRECT is a pain to use selectively.


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

Reply via email to