Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > These changes would be fine, of course. I don't know whether > this is considered legally significant, or whether my actual code > to do this is of any interest, as opposed to the idea. If you > want me to sign papers for Autoconf I'll do so.
Well, ideally I'd like someone to implement my suggestion (:-) but I guess I'll have to be the one to do it. The patch you originally proposed is small enough that no papers should be needed. Thanks for suggesting it. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
