On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:55:45AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > According to Patrick Welche on 5/28/2007 10:45 AM: > > (Also removes what appear to be spurious #( ) > > > > - case $ac_cv_c_int$1_t in #( > > - no|yes) ;; #( > > + case $ac_cv_c_int$1_t in > > + no|yes) ;; > > Sorry, but that is not spurious. It is a shell coding trick to make > syntax highlighting detect balanced (), in spite of the unbalanced ) of > portable case statements.
Fair enough! (serves me right for just using raw vi ;-) ) What do you think of the HAVE_ part? Cheers, Patrick _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
