Hello, On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 9:55 PM Zack Weinberg <za...@panix.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 3:44 PM Tadeus Prastowo <0x66726...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > When building http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/autoconf/autoconf-2.69.tar.xz > > using Bash 5.0, make check reports many failures concerning > > [shell variables BASH_ARGC and BASH_ARGV] > > This has already been patched in Autoconf development trunk. If you > apply the patch at > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/autoconf.git/patch/?id=5b9db67786a428164abafe626ab11a2754aad528 > to your copy of autoconf 2.69, almost all of the failures should go > away.
Thank you for responding. I already prepared a patch that is identical modulo ordering to the first hunk of the commit. > You may also want to consider applying > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/autoconf.git/patch/?id=dfb0659b205e03af62542cd318a9f3253e28c40a > which fixes issues that the test suite has with newer versions of > Perl. Thank you for pointing that out. I almost concluded an answer to the failing test `autotools and whitespace in file names' when I saw that the commit already gave the answer. > Note that these issues _only_ affect the test suite; as far as I know, > configure scripts generated by autoconf 2.69 work just fine with bash > 5 and current versions of perl. Yes, that's also what LFS tells people at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter06/autoconf.html by writing: "The test suite is currently broken by bash-5 and libtool-2.4.3. To run the tests anyway, issue: make check." But, I am not satisfied with such a short remark. So, I hunted the problems down. For one other patch I already prepared, I saw that the LFS maintainer had already got a fix accepted at https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/autoconf.git/patch/?id=247b02e5a5bb79ca6666e91de02ae2d3cb0cd325. > A new release of autoconf is overdue, but currently no one has time to > do all of the testing that would be required. If you would like to > help, probably the most useful thing you can do is download and > install the development version (see > https://savannah.gnu.org/git/?group=autoconf ), I cloned the development tree already. > use it to regenerate > your configure scripts, test them, and report whether or not you had > any problems. (Please don't just tell us about bugs! If you have no > problems at all with the development version that's valuable > information too.) I will schedule it for the next LFS build by adding one more extra step for each source package that has the autogen script. Once again, thank you for your information. > zw -- Best regards, Tadeus
