On Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 08:34:46AM -0500, Brian Servis wrote:
> Yes, I have found this solution to be acceptable. But the only
> disadvantage is that if you do a directory listing in /n then ALL the
> mounts that are pointed to by the symlinks get mounted. If there are a
> lot then this can take a while to process(and waste resources?).
No. If you do an ls -l /n, and /n is just symlinks, then all you get
is a list of symlinks. If you do a "ls -ld /n/*/.", then you're really
asking for a list of the top-level inodes in each filesystem, and it
has no choice but to mount them (what else could it do: make up ownership
and permissions?).
J
- autofs and mountpoint creation Roger Zimmermann
- Re: autofs and mountpoint creation Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: autofs and mountpoint creation Brian Servis
- Re: autofs and mountpoint creation Chandra R. Chegireddy
- Re: autofs and mountpoint creation H. Peter Anvin
- Re: autofs and mountpoint crea... Eric Werme USG
- Re: autofs and mountpoint ... Chandra R. Chegireddy
- Re: autofs and mountpoint ... Mark Carmichael
- Re: autofs and mountpo... Brian Servis
- Re: autofs and mountpoint creation H. Peter Anvin
- Re: autofs and mountpoint creation Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: autofs and mountpoint creation Brian Servis
- RE: autofs and mountpoint creation Coetmeur, Alain
