Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 06:25, Ian Kent wrote:
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>Soon there will be a release of autofs-4.0.0 and shortly after
>>autofs-4.1.0-beta1.
>>
>>This raises the question of where the packages should live. There is
>>also the question of whether we should have a CVS repository available.
>>
>>Comments/suggestions/offers please?
>
> I was thinking about hosting it on bkbits. I've been using BK for other
> projects lately, and it is very nice. SF has been a bit of a dog
> lately, particularly for anon-CVS.
>
You're also locking out potential developers, due to LM's "if I don't
like you you can't use it" license clause.
Agreed with SF being slow for anoncvs. There is also Savannah
(savannah.gnu.org/savannah.nongnu.org).
Obviously for posting packages there is kernel.org, as before;
unfortunately we don't really have the human resources at this time to
set up SCM repositories.
-hpa
_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
