Ian Kent wrote:

That sounds good a good idea for inclusion in 4.1.1 (I have quite a list already).

Move the decision on what the map contains to the program map implementer.
That would be fairly straight forward to implement given that I have a
placeholder function in each map module.


Well, it's pretty much the only thing that makes sense, since a program map can inherently do "anything".


Pretty much ghosting implies that there are now two operations required of a map: key->data lookup (old), and enumerate all keys (new).

And of course autofs needs to deal with the consequences of the map changing underneath it.

-hpa

_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs

Reply via email to