On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 11:35:18PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>- There is a patch for rc.autofs.in missing, changing an "else" to en > >> "elif". The idea is that failure in loading the autofs4 module should not > >> break first-time installation (see http://bugs.debian.org/280276). > > What if autofs[4] is not compiled as a module? > > In that case, it is in /proc/filesystems, and there is no problem. You > _could_ argue that is autofs3 was compiled into the kernel, it should fail, > but I can't find a good way to detect that.
Unless I see anything else I'll make the approriate change. > > >>- There seem to have been a lot of changes in rc.autofs.in (especially > >> related to timeout parsing); I'm unable to follow them all, but I hope > >> you've done the right thing in merging in the Debian patches here :-) > > Do you remember what the issues were? > > (Just to clear up; "there seems to have been a lot of changes" refers to your > changes, not the Debian changes, although there are several of those as > well.) I'm afraid this was before I took over the maintainership of the > package; the changelog is the best thing I can point you to. That's right. The Debian side of things really refers to the merging of patches I found in the packages (as best as I could) and some init script changes which you are, no doubt checking. Ian _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
