On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Denis Vlasenko wrote:

> On Thursday 14 April 2005 08:58, Ian Kent wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> > 
> > > ==> Regarding [autofs] Re: [ANNOUNCE] Important update - autofs 4.1.4 
> > > release; [EMAIL PROTECTED] adds:
> > > 
> > > raven> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >> Hi all,
> > > >> 
> > > >> Here is autofs 4.1.4.
> > > 
> > > raven> There were a couple of mistakes in the release.
> > > 
> > > raven> The kernel patches have been updated as there were some obvious
> > > raven> errors in them.  An error in patching of the Debian portion of the
> > > raven> init script was corrected.
> > > 
> > > raven> I've uploaded corrected versions along with a MD5SUMS file of
> > > raven> checksums for people to verify against.
> > > 
> > > raven> The new upload has a timestamp of 11-Apr-2005 06:21-59. If you
> > > raven> downloaded anything before this, sorry, you'll need to get the
> > > raven> updated files.
> 
> I think that you should just bump version # in such cases.
> Having several tarballs with same version # can wreak havoc.

Point taken.
Perhaps we'll see a 4.1.5 real soon as well.

This was an unusual case though.

Ian

_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs

Reply via email to