On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, Thorild Selen wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Carter) writes: > > [...] Or since userspace has to obtain the whole map anyway to > > recognize deletions, maybe it should cache the map, but only in the > > case of browsing should it install every row in the kernel. > > I believe that LCUP (LDAP Client Update Protocol, RFC 3928) could be > used for this purpose. This LDAP extension would make it possible for > a client to request the server to notify it of any modifications to a > map, including deletion of entries. > > This only applies to LDAP of course, and far from all LDAP servers > support LCUP. However, situations like this look like just what LCUP > was designed for.
But, at this stage, autofs isn't going to be listening it's going to be asking? Ian _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
