On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 18:56 -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Guillaume.Rousse> Third, the following patches still apply, but I got no > Guillaume.Rousse> clue about their usefulness: - > > Guillaume.Rousse> autofs-4.1.0-hesiod-bind.patch > > jmoyer> I'll do some digging on this one tomorrow. > > OK, it took me a while longer than expected to get to this. Sorry! > > The hesiod resolve patch is wanted. Actually, I think in v5 we can just > get rid of the old calls to hes_resolve. > > If you look at the implementation that currently is there in lookup_hesiod.c, > it has some bugs. It will free a pointer that the library will > subsequently try to free, and it also leaks memory. This is, in part, due to > the horrible definition of the interface at the time, I believe. > > At any rate, we should move to hesiod_init, hesiod_resolve, etc. It's > probably best to check that the hesiod library supports the new interfaces > at configure time. If not, just disable the building of the hesiod > modules. > > Ian, let me know what you think of the attached patch.
Looks good. I'll check more closely today and merge it if I don't see any problems. Thanks Jeff. _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
