Ian Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 15:36 +0200, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
>> Hi Ian, thanks for your support!
>> > > 
>> > > Presumably the exports are distinct, in which case using a list of
>> > > server should allow autofs to try each one?
>> 
>> Yep, they are - differnet homes come from different servers. 
>>  
>> > > What about trying something like:
>> > 
>> > On second thoughts this may get only the nfs4 or only the nfs3 servers
>> > as well.
>> 
>> Automount now mounts fine from all servers, but still nfs3
>> only. /proc/mounts shows me:
>> 
>> figaro:/users/xxx /homes/xxx nfs 
>> rw,nosuid,vers=3,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,hard,intr,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,addr=figaro
>>  0 0
>> bongossi:/export/yyy /homes/yyy nfs 
>> rw,nosuid,vers=3,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,hard,intr,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,addr=bongossi
>>  0 0
>> 
>> where figaro only exports nfs v3, bongossi exports both v4 and v3 and we
>> really would like to use v4.
>
> Actually, a multi map entry in the master map would probably work.
> Initially I missed this out of version 5 (by accident) so you'll need
> the patch on kernel.org that adds it. In fact I'd recommend applying all
> the 5.0.2 patches.
>
> So forget the last suggestion and patch and apply all the 5.0.2 patches
> on kernel.org and try a line in the master map like:
>
> /homes  multi yp auto_homes 
> -fstype=nfs4,nosuid,grpid,nobrowse,proto=tcp,port=2049 -- \
>               yp auto_homes 
> -fstype=nfs,nosuid,grpid,nobrowse,proto=tcp,port=2049
>
> and see if that gets what you need. The nfs4 one needs to be first
> because the v4 servers provide both v4 and v3.

That won't work as the cache code will not even add the second set of
entries for the keys:

cache_update:
        } else {
                /* Already seen one of these */
                if (me->age == age)
                        return CHE_OK;

-Jeff

_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs

Reply via email to