John Simon wrote:
> We have two pairs of VCS HA-NFS servers (one in each
> data center), so each entry in auto_appl is the VIP
> for the HA pair. Should one portion of the cluster in
> the data center local to the compute engines fail it
> will just fail over to the other cluster node and
> client-side failover would not be used. If however the
> entire cluster fails or is unavailable for whatever
> reason the duplicate VCS HA-NFS server in the other
> data center resumes serving data, albeit at a slightly
> slower rate due to latency over the MAN. This site to
> site failover is where we currently depend on Solaris
> client-side failover.

Ahhh.  Okay, thanx!

       ps

_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs

Reply via email to