>> i was to onervous to try the real patch for now. so i just quickly hacked >> in another buffer using the MAX_IFC_LEN. so far it seems to be happy. i >> guess i'll find out about the new malloc setup when i go to 5.3. > > Don't get me wrong, I think your caution is a sensible and responsible > approach to an unknown patch. I understand this only too well.
on my server with 1000 ips, the ip i care about is near the front, so 2048 is plenty big enough to find it. i am still having some kind of issue where at boot time, it can't seem to find a server or talk to mountd or something like that and then won't try again. it looks like maybe this is the negative caching feature? is that new as well? _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list autofs@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
