> The negative cache working properly will return a fail immediately so > you shouldn't see this. > > But then it shouldn't happen for the first case either. > There are quite a few changes scheduled for the next update and I > haven't seen this for a while now so it's a bit hard to get exited about > it. > > Ok, I understand - in summary: #1 problem should go [hopefully] away with 5.3 #2 problem is known bug being worked on.... Thanks! O.
_______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
