On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 11:27 -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Ian Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 11:00 -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote: > >> > >> The negative caching is done in userspace. I'm not sure I understand > >> your question. > > > > Me neither but I'm working on the negative caching of non-existent map > > keys. Turns out to be a bit tricky when multiple nsswitch sources can be > > tried for each mount since the map may not exist within a given source > > and so we get NSS_STATUS_UNAVAIL instead of NSS_STATUS_NOTFOUND. Maybe I > > should just cache the unavailable in the same way? > > Ian, this is autofs version 4. It's been a while since I implemented > the negative caching there, but I'd be interested in knowing if you > think I got it wrong for the case above!
Oh, yeah, lucky it will be Xmas holiday time soon. I'm going to have a look around the v4 code tomorrow. I'll spend some time on this as well. > > Cheers, > Jeff _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list autofs@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
