On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 09:24:33PM +0900, Ian Kent wrote: > I've pulled in the patches that Val posted and made a couple of > minor changes. I also have what I think is just about what we > need to reduce the overhead of file map scanning.
Great, thank you! > Check'em out please folks. I have a crumpled post-it note on my desk saying "valgrind automount." How hard would this be to do while running the Connectathon suite? It would sure make me feel better about these patches. > I'm a little concerned about the "fix kernel includes" patch because > there should be more to it and I've altered it in line with that. I'm > not sure if we should post a kernel patch first, pull in the updated > kernel header files to the tar and finally make the other couple of > changes then. But then I may have it wrong so check it out. Yeah, there's a trade-off there. I think the approach you've taken is the most sensible, given that nothing makes me more insane than out of sync user and kernel code. -VAL _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list autofs@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
