sasl could be (theoretically) built without GSSAPI support and in this case it would not require Kerberos. But the facts are: - sasl support in autofs can not be obviously compiled without gssapi - in these days sasl is many times meant as synonym for sasl/gssapi so it probably does not make any sense not to include gssapi once we include sasl.
Ondrej Matthias Koenig wrote: > Guillaume Rousse <guillaume.rou...@inria.fr> writes: > > >> More seriously, I think the proper solution would rather be fixing >> underliking in SASL (http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Underlinking). >> > > Hmm, are you really sure, that libsasl depends on kerberos symbols? > In this case you would be right. > I assumed that they're independent from each other and after > a quick grep I couldn't find any krb5_* symbols in libsasl. > At least the lookup_ldap.h header from autofs explicitly includes > the krb5.h header. > > Matthias > > _______________________________________________ > autofs mailing list > autofs@linux.kernel.org > http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs > _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list autofs@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
