On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 09:52:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 05 July 2010 21:48:01 Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 12:42:59PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > On 07/05/2010 12:24 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > > > > > Peter, if you're fine with this version. May I apply it? > > > > Unless you have a tree for autofs. > > > > > > > Ian Kent is the maintainer of autofs4 and patches for autofs4 should go > > > through him (or acked by him.) > > > > > > autofs 3 is officially unmaintained; I'm more than happy to have you > > > push the autofs 3 bits of this patch. > > > > Sure, I can split up the patch and integrate the autofs 3 part, I'll send > > the standalone autofs4 version to Ian. > > I think in this case it's really more appropriate to change both autofs3 > and autofs4 together, to avoid interdependencies. Whichever way Ian > prefers (ack the patch or take it) would work though. > > Arnd
Yeah indeed. Ian? _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
