Bruce,

Thanks for the patch. I'm away from my openSUSE 12.1 box at until Monday. 

The upgrade to openSUSE 12.1 is what prompted this bug report. The autogen 
autoopts that ships with openSUSE (5.11.8 IIRC) is broken:

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731523

I tried patching that version of autogen to install 'usage.tlib', but ran into 
another 'make check' failure. So I decided to punt and try a more updated 
autogen.

Thanks again for the patch.

Leo

On Nov 24, 2011, at 10:26 AM, "Bruce Korb" <bruce.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Leo,
> 
> Thank you for the report.  I do my development on openSuSE 11.4, not having
> upgraded yet.  I'll upgrade in a week or two.  Meanwhile,
> 
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Leo Davis <lda...@speechfxinc.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I'm getting a failure on string.test with autogen-5.13.0pre4, autogen-5.12,
>> and autogen-5.11.9 on openSUSE 12.1 x86_64.  I'm using the source RPM files
>> to build the released versions, BTW.  I've attached the entire contents of
>> the FAILURES directory for autogen-5.13.0pre4.
> 
> I dug into this.  It seems your version of Guile presumes that it is okay to
> silently remove the high-order bit from a string of characters because
> everybody knows that valid characters are in the range of 0x0a through 0x7E.
> Guile is being "helpful".  When I started there was no notion of an
> array of bytes,
> now I must change all my string references to the array-of-bytes interfaces.
> 
> *sigh*.
> 
> Please apply the following patch to the agen5/test/string.test script.
> If this also fails, then replace the "177" with "176" (the '~' character).
> That *must* work.
> 
> Your result means that it is no longer possible to reliably generate arbitrary
> arrays of bytes with autogen.  Not until I figure out how to use the Guile
> array-of-bytes stuff anyway....
> 
> Regards, Bruce
> 
> 
> 
> diff --git a/agen5/test/string.test b/agen5/test/string.test
> index 0439e6c..438dbd3 100755
> --- a/agen5/test/string.test
> +++ b/agen5/test/string.test
> @@ -82,7 +82,8 @@ CASE (suffix)  =][=
> =]
> _EOF_
> 
> -test -z "$LINENO" && LINENO=85
> +test -z "$LINENO" && LINENO=`
> +    grep -n FIND-THIS-LINE-NUMBER $0 | sed 's/:.*//'` # close enough
> printf '\nchar zTestFile[] = "%s";\n#line %s\n' \
>    ${testname}.raw `expr $LINENO + 4` >&4
> 
> @@ -94,13 +95,14 @@ char zExpect[] = "'\f\r\b\v\t\a\n\n"
>       "\"Wow!\"  This'll be \\hard\\'\n"
>       "#endif /* .\n"
>       "and it'll be a \"hassle\"."
> -       "\001\002\003\377\n'";
> +       "\001\002\003\177\n'";
> #define expectSize ((int)(sizeof(zExpect) - 1))
> int checkStr( char* pz, char const* pzWhat );
> int checkStr( char* pz, char const* pzWhat )
> {
>    static char const zNotMatch[] =
>        "%s generated string mismatches at offset %d of %d\n"
> +        "Expected char: 0x%02X  saw char: 0x%02X\n"
>        "Expected string:\n==>%s<==\n\n"
>        "Generated string:\n-->%s<--\n\n";
> 
> @@ -116,8 +118,8 @@ int checkStr( char* pz, char const* pzWhat )
> 
>    for (ix = 0; ix < expectSize; ix++) {
>        if (*(pzE++) != *(pzR++)) {
> -            fprintf( stderr, zNotMatch, pzWhat, ix, expectSize,
> -                     zExpect, pz );
> +            fprintf(stderr, zNotMatch, pzWhat, ix, expectSize,
> +                    (unsigned char)pzE[-1], (unsigned char)pzR[-1],
> zExpect, pz);
>            return 1;
>        }
>    }
> @@ -217,7 +219,7 @@ string =
> \#endif /* .
> '
>    "and it'll be a \"hassle\"."
> -    "\001\x02\X03\377\n'";
> +    "\001\x02\X03\177\n'";
> 
> _EOF_


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Autogen-users mailing list
Autogen-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/autogen-users

Reply via email to