On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 09:03, Ralf Wildenhues <ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de> wrote: > Darn, we need another name: 'archive' is likely too common when automake > is going to put all files with that name in the distribution of each > package using Automake. No need to send another patch, but any other > good suggestions that fit in with the existing scripts? > > I don't find arlib so bad, except that it sounds a bit like a library > rather than a program. > > Suggestions appreciated.
am-archive ? am-archive-helper ? -- Andrew W. Nosenko <andrew.w.nose...@gmail.com>
