At Sunday 08 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > This topic is actually better discussed when the list server is up > again, and on the automake@ list, so others can chime in, too. Agreed.
Just one thing... > > 2. Automake, in its current incarnation, is mostly > > feature-complete IMHO > > I don't quite agree; esp. since several people want automake to do > several other things, too. Wouldn't it be beatiful if such things could be done as some sort of "plugin" (even if maybe inside the official distribution itself)? Just think at how nicely the introduction of Erlang support in Autoconf has worked... Regards, Stefano
