* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:32:49PM CET: > * m4/regex.m4: Document the `AM_WITH_REGEX' macro as obsoleted,
I think technically "obsolete" is right here, without trailing "d". > and tell that it should be removed two years from now. s/tell/state/ > (AM_WITH_REGEX): Raise an m4-time warning of the "obsolete" > category when this macro is used. > * doc/automake.texi (Public Macros): Move description of > `AM_WITH_REGEX' from here ... > (Private Macros): ... to here, and declare it as obsoleted and Did you mean (Obsolete Macros) here? > "to be removed in a future version". > * tests/regex-obsolete.test: New test. That file is missing from the patch. Please resend and I'll finish the review. > * tests/Makefile.am (TESTS): Update. > +...@item AM_WITH_REGEX > +...@acindex AM_WITH_REGEX > +...@vindex WITH_REGEX > +...@opindex --with-regex > +...@cindex regex package > +...@cindex rx package > +Adds @option{--with-regex} to the @command{configure} command line. If > +specified (the default), then the @samp{regex} regular expression > +library is used, @file{regex.o} is put into @code{LIBOBJS}, and > +...@code{with_regex} is defined. If @option{--without-regex} is given, then > +the @code{rx} regular expression library is used, and @file{rx.o} is put > +into @code{LIBOBJS}. This macro is obsolete now (since rx doesn't seem > +to be maintained), and will be removed in a future version of Automake. Is rx a package? Where did you find traces to it? How about adding "Consider using gnulib if you need regex functionality."? > @end table Thanks, Ralf