On Tuesday 11 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:32:39PM CET: > > On Tuesday 11 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > Remains only bumping copyrights. > > > > > Hmm... Honestly, I left that out deliberately, since the edits done by > > this patch to the test scripts are very obvious, and because I usually > > take the copyright years to be a rough indicator of how long a file > > hasn't been touched by "real" edits (I know the git history is more > > faithful on this, but still). > > > > > For that, I guess since the testsuite > > > is going to be churned completely anyway, I suggest we just use the > > > update-copyright script from gnulib to update it overall and be done > > > with it. Would you be willing to do this (preapproved; with > > > UPDATE_COPYRIGHT_USE_INTERVALS unset)? > > > > > In light of what I said above, do you still believe the copyright bump > > is really necessary? If yes, I will amend the patch to include it. > > Well, I'm not going to make it a requirement to do along this patch, > but it will then need to be done before the next release (by somebody). > I'm not actually sure what rules FSF requires as to minor edits, but > bumping in that case is never wrong. > Better do the bumping right away then. Will do before pushing.
Thanks, Stefano