* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:03:01PM CEST: > On Thursday 31 March 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > I haven't tested on MinGW recently, and haven't tested branch-1.11 in a > > longer while. The limit was 32K for argv plus environment IIRC. > > > But then we should be pretty safe on both maint and master: > $ (cd tests && echo *.test | wc -c) > 11154 # maint > 16089 # master
Hmm. Might've been that the list was exported twice. Or with $(srcdir)/ prefix expanded. I'd need to check. I had about 2K of environment when master failed for me last time. > > > I have no big problems in applying > > > this patch to master only, but I'd rather keep it in maint unless we are > > > already dangerously near to the MinGW/MSYS upper limit. > > > > Well, apply it based on maint, > > > The patch is already based on maint ... but then, should I apply it to > maint, or merge it to master only? Let's go for maint. Thanks, Ralf