* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, May 15, 2011 at 04:10:29PM CEST: > On Sunday 15 May 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Well, the point of declaring it experimental is being able to do at > > least slightly incompatible changes and mostly getting away with it. > > > > The changes might not just be needed for portability reasons in the > > *current* code, but also for newer features in changed code. I'm > > willing to bet that your SoC project will turn up one or two such > > situations.
> Should I revert this patch then? Or should we add a more > "watered-down" warning in place of the previous "scary" one? What was scary about the previous one? I didn't find it scary. Thanks, Ralf