On 02/13/2012 04:28 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > >> * NEWS: Make it clear that it's the derived C code that has >> to be non-distributed for it to be removed by "make clean", >> not the Yacc/Lex source. Also fix some grammaros and typos. > > I apparently got that backwards. I deluded myself by thinking > that noone in their right mind would *not* distribute the Yacc/Lex > source. > Which is probably true. But since we nonetheless allow such a setup, we should strive to provide a (mostly) sane and behaviour for it.
> Ah well, sorry for the noise (but some of the typos > could still be picked out of that patch I suppose). > Yes. Will you do that, or should I? If you do, the resulting patch is pre-approved of course. Thanks, Stefano