On 08/06/2012 12:24 AM, Jack Kelly wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Stefano Lattarini > <stefano.lattar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 07/23/2012 01:26 PM, Jack Kelly wrote: >>> I think the way to do this would be as an improvement to make batch >>> mode more palatable in general. I think an environment variable or a >>> change to default behaviour is the least-potentially-breaking >>> solution. >>> >> Good. Do you fancy bringing this up on the Emacs list? As I said, no >> need to hurry. > > Done: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2012-08/msg00071.html > Thanks. Let's see how things will work out. In any case, note that I've merged the 'elisp-work' branch into master, so you can base your new work (if any) on there. I.e., you can fork a new 'elisp-work' branch off of latest master, rather than building on the top of the old 'elisp-work' branch; this should avoid extra spurious conflicts when the new work is to be merged back into master.
> If that doesn't work, I'll look into writing a patch. > >> I can do this. If you can find an autoconfiscated package that makes a >> deeper and more complex use of Emacs lisp than Autoconf does, and test >> with that, it would be great. > > I have not yet done this. I will send a note to myself and try to do > this in the next day or so. > > -- Jack Best regards, Stefano