Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattar...@gmail.com> writes: > So I ask: do you think it would be worthwhile to curb the quantity > of patches posted here, by posting only the patches judged worth > of "general interest"? Or, if that sounds overly "harsh", what > should I/we do to ensure important changes have more visibility?
I like the situation as it is. I'm an occasional commentator and a very occasional contributor, so take my opinion with some salt. It's easier for readers to filter the list in a way that makes sense to them, because one developer's "deprecation of a misfeature" can easily become a user's "sudden breaking change". I'm not saying this is done on purpose, but it's easy for it to accidentally happen. Perhaps a severity tag in the subject line is the answer? -- Jack
