I think "layers" of config.site would be useful for parts of autopackage. There are other a number of packages out there that attempt to solve this problem in different ways, with varying degrees of success. One set of extremes is the GNU stow project v. the Modules project. Lately I'm playing with ark.sourceforge.net, which seems to do a nice job of melding a lot of the issues well, and taking a larger view approach. H
- Re: More an autopackage Ganesan Rajagopal
- Re: More an autopackage David Lee
- Re: More an autopackage Alexandre Oliva
- Re: More an autopackage Rusty Ballinger
- Re: More an autopackage Geoffrey Wossum
- Re: More an autopackage Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: More an autopackage Tom Tromey
- Re: More an autopackage Tom Tromey
- Re: More an autopackage Geoffrey Wossum
- Re: More an autopackage Derek R. Price
- Re: More an autopackage Harlan Stenn
- Re: More an autopackage Tom Tromey
- Re: More an autopackage Derek R. Price
- RE: More an autopackage Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re: More an autopackage Geoffrey Wossum
- Re: More an autopackage Derek R. Price
- Re: More an autopackage Michael Sweet
- Re: More an autopackage Harlan Stenn
- Re: More an autopackage Pavel Roskin
- Re: More an autopackage Raja R Harinath
- Re: More an autopackage Michael Sweet