----- Original Message -----
From: "Akim Demaille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 3:43 AM
Subject: Re: program target missing $(EXEEXT)
> >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Tom> I think the program rules somehow touched both PROG and PROG.exe.
>
> Sorry, I'm lost :( What do you mean?
>
> I'm risking an answer which might be completely irrelevant: we now
> always use $(EXEEX), hence we don't to address both PROG and PROG.exe:
> just PROG$(EXEEXT).
>
Uhmm, actually it would be good to have a dummy PROG that just depends
on PROG$(EXEEXT)
Why?
Cygwin again :]
make prog will build the target prog, not prog.exe, and will build that
via implicit rules.
This is a nice-to-have BTW.
Rob
