Re: 76-tags-in-tags-am.patch

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Akim> Then, I'd say we should have TAGS work all by itself, calling
Akim> TAGS-recursive.  And tags is nothing but `tags: TAGS'.  How does
Akim> it sound?

Sounds good to me.

Tom