Karl Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In order to make this most useful for people to browse manuals locally > (with file://localhost), it seems it might finally be time to propose a > standard directory for HTML output from Texinfo manuals.
> The obvious directory would be $(datadir)/html by analogy with > $(datadir)/info, but it seems a bit arrogant to use such a generic name > for something which only relates to Texinfo manuals. Maybe texinfo/html > -- then we could have texinfo/xml/ and texinfo/docbook/ and ..., if we > liked. Thus: > texinfodata = $(datadir)/texinfo > texinfohtml = $(texinfodata)/html Doesn't pretty much every distribution use /usr/share/doc for this and other package documentation at this point? This would be a pretty huge change for distributions, particularly since many of them have tools to index /usr/share/doc, web servers that serve it out to localhost, etc. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
