>>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Whether using libtcswigpy_la_LDFLAGS in addition to AM_LDFLAGS is > an error I don't know. It is not nice: (i) it is a different semantics than the other variables, and (ii) the more common semantics is more flexible. > OTOH, the current behavior of AM_LDFLAGS vs. maude_LDFLAGS > sounds very counterintuitive to me. Even if it breaks some > package, I'd rather fix this to match the handling of the other > flag variables than document and carry over this exception. 100% agreed. Nice patch, many thanks!
