* Brian Dessent wrote on Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 02:42:57PM CEST: > > That brings up the next logical point, can anyone comment on the > feasibility of some kind of generalized "tool X reads A and outputs Y > and Z" construct to help solve the "tools generating multiple outputs" > case without having to emit big ugly stamp rules in Makefile.am or > resorting the GNUmake-isms?
This thread has some ideas: <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.automake.general/8916/focus=8924> If you (or anybody) finds the above useful, and think the setup is general enough for several use cases, we can think about how to integrate it into Automake proper. Of course, if anyone volunteers to work on this, be my guest! ;-) Cheers, Ralf
