On Sunday 2009-05-03 20:40, Gerald I. Evenden wrote: > >What I did to the library was add several procedures
That in itself would cause a bump in the 'current' number to 3. >but the original >functions were not changed nor affected. So 'age' becomes 1, since you are still supporting (3-1) = 2. >You all seem to be indicating that "age" is superfluous. Not at all.
