"Alfred M. Szmidt" <a...@gnu.org> wrote on 2010/01/29 11:17:24: > > And there are many examples of the opposite where less verbose output > is useful, automake already supports silent compilation. I know that
Yes, but automake --silent is a different tool, perhaps it should learn suppress the install mgs as well as other libtool msgs such as relinking as finish msgs? > I have missed errors or warnings beause having had to much output to > read, Joakim, would you like to work on a patch for this? I think it > would be immensly useful. I don't know where to start even and considering that silent builds seems to be a very controversial subject within the autotools maintainers , I think this needs to come from the maintainers themselves to have any chance to be accepted. Jocke
