Am Sonntag 11 April 2010 21:37:13 schrieb Andreas Jellinghaus: > isn't xz extremely sloooow with -9? > maybe it wasn't a bug, bit intentionally not used, > as that huge extra amount of time doesn't result in > that many bytes saved. > > is the compression level configureable somehow?
I did two tests with medium size sources and xz -6 vs. xz -9 is not a big difference in speed or compression size. so please ignore my comment. Regards, Andreas
