Hello automake list readers, Stefano asked for coverage information about Automake recently, so I triggered another 'make check-coverage' on my system, held hands of Devel::Cover a bit, waited a looong time, then collected the results. They are in a set of HTML pages roughly 500K size, the toplevel one is attached.
Should I just commit them to the web server temporarily? Anybody have a better idea of where to store such data? Anyway, the logs show that there is one place in the build or test code where we call the installed automake rather than the one inside the build tree. This causes Devel::Cover to take into account all those installed perl modules from the installed Automake package, turning all the nice statistics about how good our coverage is way down, undeservedly. ;-) Patch coming up on -patches in a minute ... The summary also shows that apparently some files are not tracked correctly, for example DisjConditions.pm, although it is fully covered by the respective unit tests. I'm not yet sure how that happened. Cheers, Ralf
