() Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattar...@gmail.com> () Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:06:14 +0100
I don't have time to look into this presently, so I'd appreciate if anyone could look into the issue (finding a way not have savannah to reject non-fast-forward pushes would be enough). I believe the project maintainer must write to the sysadmins requesting a specific change. GNU RCS is in a similar state (IIUC), the resolution of which is (perhaps) the exchange of ‘master’ and a non-‘master’ names (HEAD pointers). I say "perhaps" because i'm not really sure. More perplexed mumblings at: <http://www.gnuvola.org/u/2013/01/24h09.html>. The point is: For timely resolution, you need to take direct action. Let RCS's (ever-growing) lacuna serve as a warning! -- Thien-Thi Nguyen ..................................... GPG key: 4C807502 . NB: ttn at glug dot org is not me . . (and has not been since 2007 or so) . . ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES . ........... please send technical questions to mailing lists ...........
pgpOesbqSL3hT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
