I am not arguing for the building service, but: On 2024-04-01 14:40:20 +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > * Such an automated release building service is a piece of SaaSS. I can > hardly imagine how we at GNU tell people "SaaSS is as bad as, or worse > than, proprietary software" and at the same time advocate the use of > such a service.
Would it still be SaaSS if the full source code to such a platform was published under GPL and the only "secret sauce" would be the signing key to certify that the archive in question was produced by the GNU's (FSF's?) instance of such a platform? Have a nice day, Tomas Volf -- There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
