On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 09:51 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > OTOH I'm also fine with switching to using release branches. They > > > > are > > > > pretty. And it may be simpler for understanding that our current > > > > approach. > > > > > > I think this is cleaner and easier than merging but still preserves > > > the > > > commit history. This gets my vote going forward. > > > > I'm more accustomed to this approach, so this would get my vote. > > It is decided then. I created a first shot at the documentation at: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kparal/Sandbox:Git_release_process > > If you don't have any concerns, I'll merge it into the final release > documentation page [1]. > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AutoQA_Release_Process
Nice ... I'll absorb your draft and offer any feedback shortly. I'd like to see the entire process handled by make targets to avoid inconsistent branch and tag names. I'm thinking things like ... 'make newversion' and 'make tag' etc... I'll experiment with that once the document is finalized. Thanks, James
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ autoqa-devel mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/autoqa-devel
