On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <[email protected]> wrote: > None that comes to mind, but a grep for nic_mode in the source code > will quickly tell us if there's something to worry about.
Ok, there's no place that uses it in the current upstream tree, so I'd say it can be safely removed. > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Chris Evich <[email protected]> wrote: >> All, >> >> I noticed we still are setting 'nic_mode = tap' despite my having tried to >> remove it a while ago. The current design is such that both nettype=bridge >> or nettype=network imply the use of a tap interface, so nic_mode = tap is >> redundant (and possibly problematic if used). Does anyone know of a reason >> this parameter needs to stick around? >> >> -- >> Chris Evich, RHCA, RHCE, RHCDS, RHCSS >> Quality Assurance Engineer >> e-mail: cevich + `@' + redhat.com o: 1-888-RED-HAT1 x44214 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Autotest-kernel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/autotest-kernel > > > > -- > Lucas -- Lucas _______________________________________________ Autotest-kernel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/autotest-kernel
