On 10/10/2012 12:35 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
On 10/10/2012 11:59 AM, Gawlas, Julius wrote:
Lucas,
One more minor thought in that space. Is that really reasonable to
have separate repo for server and client tests? It seems to me that
often server tests might have a client counterpart and they might be
developed together. Perhaps it might be better to organize the repos
in the following way:
- autotest (core)
- autotest-tests (client and server)
Well, I don't know how to work out the submodules structure if we were
to have a single 'client and server tests' repo.
That said, I did organize things in sub modules in order to disrupt the
^ in order to *not* disrupt
original workflow (everything under the same roof, if people want so),
and maybe that wouldn't be necessary at all if we figure out another
arrangement that provides a decent, simple enough workflow for people.
- virt-test
- autotest-rpc (remote client, IMO great addition to autotest)
+ other projects
_______________________________________________
Autotest-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/autotest-kernel
_______________________________________________
Autotest-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/autotest-kernel
