On 15.10.2012 [19:14:04 +0000], Gawlas, Julius wrote: > We are running nightly tests suite that exercises new kernel and one of the > tests is libhugetlbfs. We are plugging in into standard libhugetlbfs using > libhugetlbfs-2.0.tar.gz. We have seen lately intermittent problems where the > suite will just hang somewhere in the middle of > > $ make check OBJDIRS=obj64 > ... > linkhuge_rw > > (Note that we don't really know much about that test, we just picked it up as > part of regression suite) > > After checking the libhugetlbfs site it turns out latest library is > libhugetlbfs-2.14, so we picked it up and attempted to run tests based > on that. But on 64 bits this fails as well: > > $ make check OBJDIRS=obj64 > LD64 (lib test) obj64/huge_below_4GB_normal_above > CC32 obj32/shmoverride_linked.o > stderr: > /usr/bin/ld: warning: zero_filesize_segment.ld contains output sections; > did you forget -T? > In file included from /usr/include/features.h:385, > from /usr/include/sys/types.h:26, > from shmoverride_linked.c:18: > /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file or > directory > make[1]: *** [obj32/shmoverride_linked.o] Error 1 > make: *** [tests/all] Error 2
So this is a bit confusing, if you look at the output, you specified you wanted the 64-bit binaries to be built and the 32-bit binaries are being built as well. But your env doesn't appear to have the 32-bit requirements. I guess you can install those 32-bit prereqs to satisfy the build. I'm trying remember my libhuge history, but I don't think the tests were ever meant to be built only 64-bit. They could be built only 32-bit (I think), but if you built 64-bit, 32-bit was also tested. I might be wrong, I will try to look at the source a little later. > Mailing list archive for libhugetlbfs seems to be filled with spam. FWIW, yes, filled with spam and very idle, but I think technically still active. No guarantees, although if you send a message there and I see it, I will respond immediately so you'll know it got through. > Anybody can help or shed any light on this? Any help or pointers would > be appreciated. Is that test bogus? > > Julius > > _______________________________________________ > Autotest-kernel mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/autotest-kernel > _______________________________________________ Autotest-kernel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/autotest-kernel
