On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:49:00AM +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I have total four patches for updating netperf to 2.6.0
> 
> Two patches for Client-tests:
>  [Virt-test-devel] [Client-Tests PATCH 0/2] update netperf to 2.6.0
>  ├─>[Client-Tests PATCH 1/2] Update netperf to 2.6.0
>  ├─>[Client-Tests PATCH 2/2] replace netperf tar package
> 
> Two patches for virt-tests:
>  ├─>[PATCH] netperf: update config and path
>  └─>[PATCH] netperf: correct send size parameters for TCP_MAERTS
> 
> 
> The issue wenli found was already fixed in netperf upstream.
> We have '-C -c' parameters in current autotest code, and I also posted
> a patch (last one) to correct send size parameters. So it's ok to use
> 2.6.0

Sorry, we have '-C -c' parameters in current autotest code', so the
output of send-size (TCP_MAERTS) will be wrong.

We can fix it by remove '-C -c' parameter, or add a patch as
wait_for_read.patch, it's not necessary, because the send-size
isn't used in parsing result. We can ignore it.

What I need to do next is updating Windows guest's netperf to 2.6.0,
or still using 2.4.5 for Windows guest. I will update those four
patches when I finished it.
 
> parameter issue:
> http://www.netperf.org/pipermail/netperf-dev/2012-December/000870.html
> man page:
> http://www.netperf.org/pipermail/netperf-dev/2012-December/000871.html
> 
> Do you have other issue with those (4) update patches?
> 

-- 
                Amos.

_______________________________________________
Autotest-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/autotest-kernel

Reply via email to