On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 2:15 PM Plamen Dimitrov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 03/01/2017 09:54 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:48 PM Plamen Dimitrov <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> On 03/01/2017 09:38 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > >>> To summarize, autotest heavily changes the loggers of its application > and > >>> core libraries to make it possible to transparently use > >>> > >>> import logging > >>> > >>> logging.info('foo') > >>> > >>> So that users and test writers don't have to. The base of this > convoluted > >>> logging setup was written a good 10 years ago, if I recall correctly. > >>> > >>> Nowadays we can simplify that custom handling, making it easier for > >>> applications that only use autotest as a library, in this case, > >> virt-test. > >>> Lukas wants to propose this set of changes but was wondering how many > >>> people nowadays run virt-test using autotest instead of using avocado, > to > >>> estimate the impact of the changes. > >>> > >> We make heavy use of autotest with virt-test and don't plan on moving to > >> avocado soon. I didn't reply before because from the question it seemed > >> that you are asking for people using autotest with avocado. In any case, > >> I am just mentioning here for your information that we run a test suite > >> on our custom server distribution using the two. > >> > > Hmm.... I think I made a mistake, Lukas' solution is actually going to be > > implemented on the virt-test side, but that solution is going to impact > > people driving virt-test through autotest, so no impact to Chris' team > and > > yours. > > What do you mean by "implemented on the virt-test side"? Isn't virt-test > read-only now? Or do you mean avocado? And by "impact people driving > virt-test through autotest" I understand exactly our team (using > autotest + virt-test as I mentioned above) but you mention that this > won't affect us or am I wrong? > OK, so once again I was wrong, sorry about that. For some reason I understood you guys implemented tests in autotest that were not related to avocado-vt or virt-test. Please bear with me, I had a busy day yesterday and my brain faltered :) > Thanks, > Plamen Dimitrov > > > _______________________________________________ > Autotest-kernel mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/autotest-kernel
_______________________________________________ Autotest-kernel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/autotest-kernel
