On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Martin Bligh <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, James Laska <[email protected]> wrote: >> 3. Other solutions not considered? >> 4. Would there be any interest in reviewing any proposed patches >> for inclusion into autotest? > > It needs to continue to work in the way it does now, but if you can > make it work with alternate locations as well without breaking that, > I guess we can look at patches to do that. One big concern is making > sure that this doesn't get broken in the future, as nobody else will be > using this setup. > > If possible, I'd strongly encourage you to keep it all under one directory > as a package, maintenance will be a lot easier
I second that. Keeping large patches to change structure will obviously be a pain to maintain. The directory structure chosen makes it easy to intrude the least possible on the system under test, so it's not like autotest is different just for the sake of being different. -- Lucas _______________________________________________ Autotest mailing list [email protected] http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest
